Entire Launches: Git Hosts for AI Agents 2026

GitHub is the incumbent Entire targets, and it is not standing still. Copilot code review runs on an agentic tool-calling architecture and is generally available on the paid Copilot plans, and GitHub says more than 60 million Copilot code reviews have been run. Through Agent HQ, GitHub has also put third-party coding agents such as Claude and Codex into the platform. At launch that was a public preview for Copilot Pro+ and Enterprise subscribers, so check the current plan terms. GitHub Universe runs October 28-29, 2026 in San Francisco, right after Entire's launch; we found no coverage of its announcements yet. The weak point Entire attacks is reliability under agent load: IncidentHub counted 257 GitHub incidents between May 2025 and April 2026, 48 of them major outages by its own definition.

GitLab made its Duo Agent Platform generally available on January 15, 2026. On March 19, 2026 it moved Code Review Flow to flat-rate pricing of one GitLab Credit per four reviews, which GitLab lists as $0.25 per review regardless of merge request size. GitLab's claim that competitors charge $15 to $25 per review is its own comparison, not independently verified. For teams wary of open-ended agent spend, a fixed per-review price is the most concrete cost control among the incumbents.

Entire describes itself as "the Git forge for agent-human collaboration". Its Trails feature replaces the pull request with rolling evaluation scores from automated review agents, and teams can configure whether passing evals merge automatically or a person must approve. Continuous Memory stores prompts, responses and tool calls alongside a code graph through two open-source tools, entire-graph and entire-brain, which Entire says cuts token use by up to 71%. The site also advertises pushes up to 89 times faster than GitHub in its own forgemark benchmark. Both figures are company claims. Hosting is distributed; launch coverage lists regions in the US, EU, India and Australia, though the company's own page lists a slightly different set of cities. Entire raised a $60 million seed round in February 2026. Pricing is not published, and public repositories, self-hosting and enterprise offerings are on the roadmap, so treat it as early-stage.

Cursor maker Anysphere announced Origin, its own code hosting product, in June 2026. An early beta began rolling out on August 17 to users on paid Cursor plans, except enterprise organizations whose admins opt out. The initial scope is repositories, pull requests, code browsing and GitHub sync, reached through a Codebase tab in the desktop app and a command-line tool. It works as a bridge: pushes keep going to GitHub, which stays the source of truth for anything started there. eWeek advises testing Origin alongside GitHub rather than replacing established source control, and The Next Web reports that Cursor has not published dedicated terms covering retention, data residency or export.

Bitbucket from Atlassian gets agentic review through Rovo Dev Code Review, which Atlassian says works with Bitbucket Cloud and GitHub repositories (its FAQ lists only those two). It leaves in-line suggestions on correctness, security, performance and maintainability that can be applied from the pull request, and it can check a change against the acceptance criteria in a linked Jira issue. Admins enable it from the Rovo Dev settings page. Atlassian says Rovo Dev has separate pricing and packaging from Rovo, but the page states no price, so confirm costs with Atlassian. The Jira link is the differentiator: no other host here validates a pull request against a ticket's acceptance criteria.

Codeberg is a non-profit Git host that runs on Forgejo. It is here as a counterpoint: in July 2026 Codeberg e.V. members approved a rule, by a vote of 358 to 144, restricting repositories made almost entirely by AI agents or maintained through heavy use of tools such as Claude and Codex. A separate motion passed at the same assembly commits Codeberg never to use project or user code to train AI tools. If your workflow is agent-first, Codeberg is the wrong host. If you want a host deliberately not built for agents, it is the clearest option.